State v. Jackson

442 S.W.3d 202, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1009, 2014 WL 4589573
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 917
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 16, 2014·No. No. ED 99767·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brandon Jackson (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo (2000), and one corresponding count of armed criminal action (“ACA”), in violation of Section 571.015.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jackson, 442 S.W.3d 202, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1009, 2014 WL 4589573 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

442 S.W.3d 202 (State v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.