State v. Jackson

387 S.W.3d 408, 2012 WL 6139044, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1559
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 841
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 11, 2012·No. No. ED 98198·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sharod J. Jackson appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for possession of a controlled substance — cocaine base, in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo. Cum.Supp.2010, for which he was sentenced to two-years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, [409]*409provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jackson, 387 S.W.3d 408, 2012 WL 6139044, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1559 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

387 S.W.3d 408 (State v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.