State v. Jackson
Opinion
ORDER
Lorenzo Jackson appeals from the circuit court’s order and judgment denying his petition for declaratory judgment. Jackson contends the circuit court erred in denying his petition without specifically declaring his rights as requested.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
320 S.W.3d 167 (State v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.