State v. Jackson

247 S.W.3d 605, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2008 WL 708562
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 2008·No. ED 89663·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vaughn Jackson (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction for second-degree robbery in the Circuit Court of St. Louis City. In his sole point on appeal, Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for violation of his right to a speedy trial. He claims that he suffered an unreasonable delay of fourteen months that was not attributable to his own actions and he was prejudiced.

*606 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jackson, 247 S.W.3d 605, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 346, 2008 WL 708562 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

247 S.W.3d 605 (State v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rogers
247 S.W.3d 605 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)