State v. Jackson

389 S.W.3d 268, 2012 WL 6694067, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1631
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Jackson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 841
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 26, 2012·No. No. ED 98327·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donnie L. Jackson (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing. Movant asserts that the motion court erred in denying, without a hearing, his claims that: (1) he is entitled to DNA testing of cultures obtained from the victim; and (2) his counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain a “tissue match” and certain blood tests.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Jackson, 389 S.W.3d 268, 2012 WL 6694067, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1631 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

389 S.W.3d 268 (State v. Jackson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.