State v. Isom

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Isom

894 S.W.2d 230, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 391

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 7, 1995

DocketNos. 64181, 65700

StatusPublished

This text of 894 S.W.2d 230 (State v. Isom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Isom, 894 S.W.2d 230, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 391 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993, and the motion court denied his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find no error of law appears and the findings of fact issued by the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this case, and we affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of possession of a controlled substance in violation of § 195.202, RSMo Supp.1993, and the motion court denied his Rule 29.15 motion on the merits without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We find no error of law appears and the findings of fact issued by the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). Further, we find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion in this case, and we affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

894 S.W.2d 230, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-isom-moctapp-1995.