State v. Howard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Howard

388 S.W.3d 250, 2012 WL 5866519, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1456

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 469 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 2012·No. No. ED 97668·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brian Howard appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of third-degree domestic assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no error in entering its judgment and sentence. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Brian Howard appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of third-degree domestic assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court committed no error in entering its judgment and sentence. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Howard, 388 S.W.3d 250, 2012 WL 5866519, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1456 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

388 S.W.3d 250 (State v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.