State v. Howard

309 S.W.3d 446, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 583, 2010 WL 1849318
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1322
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 2010·No. WD 70233·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Following a jury trial, Pierre Howard appeals his conviction for forcible rape, Section 566.032, RSMo 2000. He contends the circuit court plainly erred in admitting evidence related to uncharged crimes. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Howard, 309 S.W.3d 446, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 583, 2010 WL 1849318 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

309 S.W.3d 446 (State v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.