State v. Howard
309 S.W.3d 446, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 583, 2010 WL 1849318
This text of 309 S.W.3d 446 (State v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Howard, 309 S.W.3d 446, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 583, 2010 WL 1849318 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
Order
Following a jury trial, Pierre Howard appeals his conviction for forcible rape, Section 566.032, RSMo 2000. He contends the circuit court plainly erred in admitting evidence related to uncharged crimes. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
309 S.W.3d 446, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 583, 2010 WL 1849318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-howard-moctapp-2010.