State v. Howard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Howard

338 S.W.3d 413, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 469, 2011 WL 1362614

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 12, 2011·No. WD 71618·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kimberlie L. Howard appeals the Benton County Circuit Court’s judgment convicting her of stealing by deceit pursuant to § 570.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2005. Howard argues on appeal that the circuit erred by refusing her jury instruction concerning the special negative defense of claim of right, and by overruling her motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Kimberlie L. Howard appeals the Benton County Circuit Court’s judgment convicting her of stealing by deceit pursuant to § 570.030, RSMo Cum.Supp.2005. Howard argues on appeal that the circuit erred by refusing her jury instruction concerning the special negative defense of claim of right, and by overruling her motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the evidence. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Howard, 338 S.W.3d 413, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 469, 2011 WL 1362614 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

338 S.W.3d 413 (State v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related