State v. Howard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Howard

36 S.W.3d 804, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 234, 2001 WL 118537

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2001·No. No. ED 75925·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted burglary first degree, in violation of Section 564.011 RSMo (1994). The trial court sentenced him to four years imprisonment and ordered him to pay a fine of $2,500.00.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[805]*805The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted burglary first degree, in violation of Section 564.011 RSMo (1994). The trial court sentenced him to four years imprisonment and ordered him to pay a fine of $2,500.00.

No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[805]*805The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Howard, 36 S.W.3d 804, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 234, 2001 WL 118537 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

36 S.W.3d 804 (State v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.