State v. Howard

17 S.W.3d 902, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 577, 2000 WL 459434
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Howard. Read the opinion of the Court — 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1417
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 25, 2000·No. No. ED 75069·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Howard (Appellant) appeals his conviction by jury in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis of murder in the first degree, § 565.020 RSMo (1994)1, two [903]*903counts of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, two counts of burglary in the first degree, § 569.160, assault in the first degree, § 565.050, two counts of forcible sodomy, § 566.060, and four counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s ruling was not an abuse of discretion. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Howard, 17 S.W.3d 902, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 577, 2000 WL 459434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

17 S.W.3d 902 (State v. Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.