State v. Howard

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Howard

988 S.W.2d 542, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 146

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 16, 1999

DocketNos. 71257, 74100

StatusPublished

This text of 988 S.W.2d 542 (State v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Howard, 988 S.W.2d 542, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 146 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault in the first degree and armed criminal action and sentencing him to seventeen years imprisonment. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of assault in the first degree and armed criminal action and sentencing him to seventeen years imprisonment. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

988 S.W.2d 542, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-howard-moctapp-1999.