State v. Hopson

285 A.2d 225, 60 N.J. 1, 1971 N.J. LEXIS 155
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 20, 1971·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinions

Pee Curiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed for the reasons given by Judge Halpern in his dissenting opinion. (114 N. J. Super. 146, 148 (1971))

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hopson, 285 A.2d 225, 60 N.J. 1, 1971 N.J. LEXIS 155 (N.J. 1971).

285 A.2d 225 (State v. Hopson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Levine
601 A.2d 249 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
State v. Des Marets
455 A.2d 1074 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
State v. Ribbecke
447 A.2d 215 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
State v. Wilson
385 A.2d 304 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
State v. Knight
369 A.2d 913 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)
State v. Robinson
352 A.2d 587 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
State v. Prewitt
318 A.2d 427 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
State v. McBride
317 A.2d 727 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
State v. Brozi
311 A.2d 757 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1973)
State v. Hopson
285 A.2d 225 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1971)