Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Hindle

State v. Hindle

245 P.3d 703, 240 Or. App. 322
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 29, 2010
DocketD082903T A141432
StatusPublished

This text of 245 P.3d 703 (State v. Hindle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hindle, 245 P.3d 703, 240 Or. App. 322 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

245 P.3d 703 (2010)
240 Or. App. 322

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Jason Oliver HINDLE, Defendant-Appellant.

D082903T; A141432.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted November 2, 2010.
Decided December 29, 2010.

Thomas Ifversen and Kahn & Ifversen Attorneys, L.L.P., filed the brief for appellant.

Stacey RJ Guise, Senior Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge, and SERCOMBE, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Corn, 232 Or.App. 566, 222 P.3d 48 (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. CORN
222 P.3d 48 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
State v. Hindle
245 P.3d 703 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
245 P.3d 703, 240 Or. App. 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hindle-orctapp-2010.