Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. CORN

State v. CORN

222 P.3d 48, 232 Or. App. 566
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedDecember 16, 2009
Docket082398, A140600
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 222 P.3d 48 (State v. CORN) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. CORN, 222 P.3d 48, 232 Or. App. 566 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

222 P.3d 48 (2009)
232 Or. App. 566

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Robert Joe CORN, Respondent-Appellant.

082398, A140600.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted on November 19, 2009.
Decided December 16, 2009.

Dennis V. Messoline, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Greg Rios, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General.

Before SERCOMBE, Presiding Judge, and BREWER, Chief Judge, and LEONARD, Judge pro tempore.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Orueta, 343 Or. 118, 164 P.3d 267 (2007).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hindle
245 P.3d 703 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 P.3d 48, 232 Or. App. 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-corn-orctapp-2009.