State v. Hill

365 S.W.3d 603, 2012 WL 453734, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 165
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 14, 2012
DocketED 96068
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 S.W.3d 603 (State v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hill, 365 S.W.3d 603, 2012 WL 453734, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 165 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of the sale of a controlled substance, in violation of section 195.211 RSMo (2000). The trial court found him to be a prior and persistent offender and a prior and persistent drug offender and sentenced him to twenty years imprisonment without probation or parole, to be served concurrently with sentences imposed in other cases.

No error of law appears, and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Durham v. State
365 S.W.3d 603 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 S.W.3d 603, 2012 WL 453734, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hill-moctapp-2012.