State v. Hill

330 S.W.3d 503, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 268, 2010 WL 785348
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hill. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 279
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 9, 2010·No. ED 92433·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Craig Hill (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree murder, two counts of first-degree assault, and three counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no plain error. Rule 30.20 1 ; State v. Washington, 260 S.W.3d 875, 879 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2008, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hill, 330 S.W.3d 503, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 268, 2010 WL 785348 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

330 S.W.3d 503 (State v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Washington
260 S.W.3d 875 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)