Durham v. State
365 S.W.3d 603, 2012 WL 1288723, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 524
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. Ronald Durham appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to properly advise him of the constitutional right to testify and failing to object to improper evidence of prior, uncharged misconduct.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Durham v. State, 365 S.W.3d 603, 2012 WL 1288723, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 524 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
365 S.W.3d 603 (Durham v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hill
365 S.W.3d 603 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)