Durham v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Durham v. State

365 S.W.3d 603, 2012 WL 1288723, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 524

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 17, 2012

DocketWD 73597

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 S.W.3d 603 (Durham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Durham v. State, 365 S.W.3d 603, 2012 WL 1288723, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 524 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Ronald Durham appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to properly advise him of the constitutional right to testify and failing to object to improper evidence of prior, uncharged misconduct.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Ronald Durham appeals the denial of a Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to properly advise him of the constitutional right to testify and failing to object to improper evidence of prior, uncharged misconduct.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 S.W.3d 603, 2012 WL 1288723, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/durham-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack