State v. Henderson

109 Mo. 292
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided October 15, 1891·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Thomas, J.

The defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Callaway county for wilfully failing to keep and render a true account of the fees received by him in his official capacity as clerk of the county court of said county, and for wilfully failing to pay into the treasury of said county fees, alleged to have been received by him as such clerk, in excess of the compensation allowed him by law. The defendant filed his motion to quash the indictment, which, being sustained, the state has brought the case here' by appeal.

[293] The rule in this state is well settled that a motion to quash an indictment does not constitute a part of the record proper, and the motion in this case, not having been preserved by bill of exceptions, we cannot review the action of the court below in sustaining it. State v. Wall, 15 Mo. 208; State v. Gee, 79 Mo. 313; State v. Thurston, 83 Mo. 271; State v. Vincent, 91 Mo. 662.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Henderson, 109 Mo. 292 (Mo. 1891).

109 Mo. 292 (State v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. McKay
125 S.W. 478 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
State v. Finley
91 S.W. 942 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)
State v. Tooker
87 S.W. 487 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1905)
State v. Campbell
43 S.W. 167 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
State v. Russell
69 Mo. App. 441 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1897)
State v. Fraker
38 S.W. 909 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
City of Columbia v. Dorsey
63 Mo. App. 626 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1895)