State v. Russell

69 Mo. App. 441, 1897 Mo. App. LEXIS 73
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 23, 1897
StatusPublished

This text of 69 Mo. App. 441 (State v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Russell, 69 Mo. App. 441, 1897 Mo. App. LEXIS 73 (Mo. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

Bond, J.

The defendant was indicted for gambling. He filed a motion to quash, which was sustained. The state appealed. No bill of exceptions was taken.

[442]*442A motion to quash an indictment is not part of the record proper, hence it is not preserved' for review, in the absence of a bill of exceptions. State v. Flora, 109 Mo. 292.

The judgment herein is affirmed.

Judge Biggs concurs. Judge Bland not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Henderson
109 Mo. 292 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Mo. App. 441, 1897 Mo. App. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-russell-moctapp-1897.