State v. Thruston
This text of 83 Mo. 271 (State v. Thruston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was indicted for selling-liquor without license. In the record, it is recited that the defendant filed a petition to quash the indictment, and that the same was by consent of the parties submitted to the court, and that the court, after hearing and understanding the same, sustained it, and thereupon discharged the defendant. As this motion is not preserved in the record, by bill of exceptions, the reasons urged in it for quashing the indictment do not appear, and ■consequently the action of the lower court in sustaining it cannot be reviewed by this court on appeal or writ of ■error. State v. Gee, 79 Mo. 313. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 Mo. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-thruston-mo-1884.