State v. Harris
207 S.W.3d 694, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1833, 2006 WL 3524297
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 370 →
Opinion
Order
Roy Harris appeals the trial court’s entry of a sentence and judgment claiming that the State failed to prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of two forgery charges. We find that there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might have found Harris guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The trial court’s entry of judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Harris, 207 S.W.3d 694, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1833, 2006 WL 3524297 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
207 S.W.3d 694 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.