State v. Harris

140 S.W.3d 617, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1138, 2004 WL 1773552

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 370 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 10, 2004·No. No. WD 63890·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. Lyell D. Harris was charged with possession of methamphetamine, possession of alprazolam, driving while intoxicated because he was under the influence of alcohol and marijuana, and driving while his license was suspended or revoked. Mr. Harris moved to suppress all of the evidence found during the stop and the trial court granted the request for some of the items. The State appeals the trial court’s decision to suppress certain evidence.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Harris, 140 S.W.3d 617, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1138, 2004 WL 1773552 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

140 S.W.3d 617 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.