State v. Harris

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Harris

193 S.W.3d 795, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 845, 2006 WL 1604458

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 13, 2006·No. No. ED 86770·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[796]*796ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Fred Harris, appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury for forcible rape, Section 566.030, RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[796]*796ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Fred Harris, appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury for forcible rape, Section 566.030, RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Harris, 193 S.W.3d 795, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 845, 2006 WL 1604458 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

193 S.W.3d 795 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related