State v. Harris

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Harris

193 S.W.3d 795, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 845, 2006 WL 1604458

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 13, 2006

DocketNo. ED 86770

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 193 S.W.3d 795 (State v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harris, 193 S.W.3d 795, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 845, 2006 WL 1604458 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

[796]*796ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Fred Harris, appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury for forcible rape, Section 566.030, RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[796]*796ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Fred Harris, appeals from the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury for forcible rape, Section 566.030, RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 S.W.3d 795, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 845, 2006 WL 1604458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harris-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack