State v. Harding

506 A.2d 1152, 1986 Me. LEXIS 741
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMarch 25, 1986
StatusPublished

This text of 506 A.2d 1152 (State v. Harding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Harding, 506 A.2d 1152, 1986 Me. LEXIS 741 (Me. 1986).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Robert Harding appeals his conviction in Superior Court, Androscoggin County, of aggravated assault, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 208 (1983), contending that the sanction imposed on the State for discovery violations was inadequate. Harding also objects to a jury instruction, which he had requested, concerning a witness not available for trial. We conclude that the sanction imposed on the State was within the court’s discretion, and we find no obvious error in the jury instruction.

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 208
Maine § 208

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 A.2d 1152, 1986 Me. LEXIS 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harding-me-1986.