State v. Hammond

357 N.W.2d 278, 1984 S.D. LEXIS 398
CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 7, 1984
Docket14420
StatusPublished
Cited by23 cases

This text of 357 N.W.2d 278 (State v. Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hammond, 357 N.W.2d 278, 1984 S.D. LEXIS 398 (S.D. 1984).

Opinions

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was convicted of grand theft (SDCL 22-30A-1 and SDCL 22-30A-17) by a Beadle County jury on October 5, 1983. On October 27, 1983, he was sentenced to a term in the South Dakota State Penitentiary. On appeal from the judgment of conviction, appellant alleges two errors by the trial judge and further contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel.

The two allegations of trial court error involve the trial judge’s refusal to suppress statements made by appellant both at the scene of his arrest and later during questioning. Generally, issues involving suppression of statements present novel circumstances and provide- a convenient forum for considering constitutional questions. In this case, however, the issues presented by appellant have been previously decided by this and many other appellate courts. Further discussion of these matters would be fruitless. We hold that appellant’s claims of error are without merit.

[279]*279Appellant contends that his conviction should be reversed because he was not afforded effective assistance of counsel at trial. Much has been written by this court on that subject. A rule has evolved to the effect that the allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel will be considered by this court only upon an appeal from habeas corpus (formerly post-conviction) proceedings unless trial counsel’s actions amount to plain error. State v. Tchida, 347 N.W.2d 338 (S.D.1984); State v. Iron Shell, 336 N.W.2d 372 (S.D.1983); State v. Phipps, 318 N.W.2d 128 (S.D.1982); State v. Brammer, 304 N.W.2d 111 (S.D.1981); State v. McBride, 296 N.W.2d 551 (S.D.1980). From the record presented we find insufficient evidence of ineffective assistance of trial counsel to warrant considering the allegation on direct appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

MORGAN and HENDERSON, JJ., concur. WUEST, Circuit Judge, Acting as Supreme Court Justice, concurs specially. WOLLMAN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, sitting for FOSEHIM, C.J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Petersen
515 N.W.2d 687 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
State v. Fender
504 N.W.2d 858 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1993)
State v. Beynon
484 N.W.2d 898 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1992)
State v. Jett
474 N.W.2d 741 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Wurtz
436 N.W.2d 839 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Cochrun
434 N.W.2d 370 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Blalack
434 N.W.2d 55 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Schulz
409 N.W.2d 655 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
Woods v. Solem
405 N.W.2d 59 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Aliberti
401 N.W.2d 729 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Davis
401 N.W.2d 721 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Anderson
387 N.W.2d 544 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1986)
State v. Tiger
365 N.W.2d 855 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. Hammond
357 N.W.2d 278 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 N.W.2d 278, 1984 S.D. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hammond-sd-1984.