State v. Hairston

883 N.E.2d 458, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1441
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 26, 2008
Docket2007-2306
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 883 N.E.2d 458 (State v. Hairston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hairston, 883 N.E.2d 458, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1441 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Franklin App. Nos. 07AP-160 and 07AP-161, 2007-Ohio-5928. Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal not accepted.

Moyer, C.J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal. Lanzinger, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II and the cross-appeal. Cupp, J., dissents and would accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. II and III.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hairston, 08ap-640 (3-3-2009)
2009 Ohio 939 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
883 N.E.2d 458, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hairston-ohio-2008.