State v. Goetz

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Goetz

369 So. 2d 138, 1979 La. LEXIS 6176

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 16, 1979

DocketNo. 64052

StatusPublished

This text of 369 So. 2d 138 (State v. Goetz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Goetz, 369 So. 2d 138, 1979 La. LEXIS 6176 (La. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Carl Goetz applying for writs of review, certiorari and mandamus. Parish of Ascension.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Penrose St. Amant, Judge of the 23rd Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Ascension, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 30th day of March, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

[139]*139It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel, shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Carl Goetz applying for writs of review, certiorari and mandamus. Parish of Ascension.

Writ granted.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Penrose St. Amant, Judge of the 23rd Judicial District, Court for the Parish of Ascension, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 30th day of March, 1979, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

[139]*139It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through counsel, shall show cause, in this Court, on a date to be fixed by this Court, why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

369 So. 2d 138, 1979 La. LEXIS 6176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goetz-la-1979.