State v. Godines
This text of State v. Godines (State v. Godines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000384 04-MAY-2016 02:55 PM
SCWC-14-0000384
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
STATE OF HAWAI'I,
Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
DANNETTE GODINES,
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-14-0000384; CASE NO. 3DTC-13-000064)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee’s Application for Writ of
Certiorari, filed ex officio on March 24, 2016, is hereby
accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
held, subject to further order of this court. Any party may,
within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules
of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 4, 2016.
Dannette Godines /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Godines, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-godines-haw-2016.