State v. Frazier

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Frazier

343 S.W.3d 769, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 983, 2011 WL 3047494

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 26, 2011

DocketWD 72230

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 343 S.W.3d 769 (State v. Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Frazier, 343 S.W.3d 769, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 983, 2011 WL 3047494 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Warren Frazier was convicted after a jury trial of one count of murder in the first degree, Section 565.020 (RSMo 2000); and one count of armed criminal action, Section 571.015 (RSMo 2000). On appeal, Frazier contends that the circuit court erred in entering judgment against him because of insufficiency of the evidence. For reasons explained in a memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Warren Frazier was convicted after a jury trial of one count of murder in the first degree, Section 565.020 (RSMo 2000); and one count of armed criminal action, Section 571.015 (RSMo 2000). On appeal, Frazier contends that the circuit court erred in entering judgment against him because of insufficiency of the evidence. For reasons explained in a memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

343 S.W.3d 769, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 983, 2011 WL 3047494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-frazier-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack