State v. Frazier

326 S.W.3d 506, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2010 WL 4628292
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 16, 2010·No. ED 93021·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Henry Frazier (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of first-degree assault, Section 565.050, RSMo 2000, 1 and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Defendant argues the trial court (1) plainly erred in submitting instruction number five to the jury and (2) abused its discretion in failing to instruct the jury on third-degree assault.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Frazier, 326 S.W.3d 506, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2010 WL 4628292 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

326 S.W.3d 506 (State v. Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry Frazier v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014
Frazier v. State
431 S.W.3d 486 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014)
Dodd v. State
326 S.W.3d 506 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)