State v. Frazier

326 S.W.3d 506, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2010 WL 4628292
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 16, 2010
DocketED 93021
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 326 S.W.3d 506 (State v. Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Frazier, 326 S.W.3d 506, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2010 WL 4628292 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Henry Frazier (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of first-degree assault, Section 565.050, RSMo 2000, 1 and armed criminal action, Section 571.015. Defendant argues the trial court (1) plainly erred in submitting instruction number five to the jury and (2) abused its discretion in failing to instruct the jury on third-degree assault.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry Frazier v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014
Frazier v. State
431 S.W.3d 486 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014)
Dodd v. State
326 S.W.3d 506 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
326 S.W.3d 506, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2010 WL 4628292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-frazier-moctapp-2010.