Dodd v. State

326 S.W.3d 506, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1554, 2010 WL 4628247
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 16, 2010
DocketED 94501
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 326 S.W.3d 506 (Dodd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dodd v. State, 326 S.W.3d 506, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1554, 2010 WL 4628247 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Kevin Dodd, appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Frazier
326 S.W.3d 506 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
326 S.W.3d 506, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1554, 2010 WL 4628247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dodd-v-state-moctapp-2010.