State v. Webb
This text of 343 S.W.3d 769 (State v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Jason Webb appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial following his conviction for assault in the first degree, two counts of armed criminal action, and attempted robbery in the first degree. Webb alleges that the State failed *770 to correct Keith Nolen’s testimony regarding a plea agreement. Webb argues that Nolen’s testimony that his plea agreement was for a five year prison sentence was false because Nolen was able to argue for probation at sentencing. Webb contends that had the jury been informed that No-len could argue for probation at sentencing, the jury would have disbelieved No-len’s testimony implicating Webb in the crimes for which he was charged. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
343 S.W.3d 769, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 985, 2011 WL 3047493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-webb-moctapp-2011.