State v. Fairley
This text of 580 P.2d 179 (State v. Fairley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[691]*691MEMORANDUM OPINION.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals, 33 Or App 271, 576 P2d 38 (1978), is reversed for failure to suppress evidence seized in violation of ORS 131.625. State v. Valdez, 277 Or 621, 629, 561 P2d 1006 (1977). There was insufficient evidence of danger to the police officer who made the seizure to justify failure to satisfy the statute.
The case is remanded with instructions to suppress the seized evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 P.2d 179, 282 Or. 689, 1978 Ore. LEXIS 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fairley-or-1978.