State v. Fairley

580 P.2d 179, 282 Or. 689, 1978 Ore. LEXIS 959
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedJune 20, 1978
DocketC 77-02-02660, CA 8857, SC 25736
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 580 P.2d 179 (State v. Fairley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Fairley, 580 P.2d 179, 282 Or. 689, 1978 Ore. LEXIS 959 (Or. 1978).

Opinions

[691]*691MEMORANDUM OPINION.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals, 33 Or App 271, 576 P2d 38 (1978), is reversed for failure to suppress evidence seized in violation of ORS 131.625. State v. Valdez, 277 Or 621, 629, 561 P2d 1006 (1977). There was insufficient evidence of danger to the police officer who made the seizure to justify failure to satisfy the statute.

The case is remanded with instructions to suppress the seized evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Vu
770 P.2d 577 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Lowry
667 P.2d 996 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Davis
666 P.2d 802 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Newton
636 P.2d 393 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)
State v. Scharf
605 P.2d 690 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1980)
State v. Classen
590 P.2d 1198 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Gaffney
583 P.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)
State v. Fairley
580 P.2d 179 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 P.2d 179, 282 Or. 689, 1978 Ore. LEXIS 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-fairley-or-1978.