State v. Fairley
580 P.2d 179, 282 Or. 689, 1978 Ore. LEXIS 959
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided June 20, 1978·No. C 77-02-02660, CA 8857, SC 25736·Published·Cited by 14 cases
Opinions
[691] MEMORANDUM OPINION.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals, 33 Or App 271, 576 P2d 38 (1978), is reversed for failure to suppress evidence seized in violation of ORS 131.625. State v. Valdez, 277 Or 621, 629, 561 P2d 1006 (1977). There was insufficient evidence of danger to the police officer who made the seizure to justify failure to satisfy the statute.
The case is remanded with instructions to suppress the seized evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Fairley, 580 P.2d 179, 282 Or. 689, 1978 Ore. LEXIS 959 (Or. 1978).
580 P.2d 179 (State v. Fairley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Vu
770 P.2d 577 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1989)
State v. Lowry
667 P.2d 996 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Davis
666 P.2d 802 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1983)
State v. Newton
636 P.2d 393 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1981)
State v. Scharf
605 P.2d 690 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1980)
State v. Classen
590 P.2d 1198 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1979)
State v. Gaffney
583 P.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1978)
State v. Fairley
580 P.2d 179 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1978)