State v. Faamama
This text of State v. Faamama (State v. Faamama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000061 03-AUG-2016 08:16 AM
SCWC-14-0000061
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
STATE OF HAWAI'I,
Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
LEON MAKANALANI FAAMAMA,
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-14-0000061; CR. NO. 12-1-1457)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.,
and Circuit Judge Crandall, in place of Wilson, J., recused)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ
of Certiorari, filed on June 21, 2016, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held, subject to further order of this court. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 3, 2016.
Thomas R. Waters /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
for petitioner
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
James M. Anderson
for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Virginia L. Crandall
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Faamama, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-faamama-haw-2016.