State v. Faamama

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Faamama. Read the opinion of the Court — 139 Haw. 94
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided August 3, 2016·No. SCWC-14-0000061·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0000061

03-AUG-2016

08:16 AM

SCWC-14-0000061

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

STATE OF HAWAI'I,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

LEON MAKANALANI FAAMAMA,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-14-0000061; CR. NO. 12-1-1457)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ., and Circuit Judge Crandall, in place of Wilson, J., recused)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on June 21, 2016, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be held, subject to further order of this court. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, August 3, 2016.

Thomas R. Waters /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

James M. Anderson for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Virginia L. Crandall

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Faamama, (haw 2016).

State v. Faamama (State v. Faamama) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.