State v. Edwards

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Edwards

902 S.W.2d 378, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1353, 1995 WL 434307

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Edwards. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 160 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 25, 1995·No. Nos. 64639, 66718·Published

Opinion

[379]*379 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals Ms conviction of burglary in the second degree in violation of § 569.170 RSMol986. Defendant also appeals the demal, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Defendant was sentenced to a term of fifteen years as a prior and persistent offender, § 558.016 (Supp.1993).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opimon for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[379]*379 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals Ms conviction of burglary in the second degree in violation of § 569.170 RSMol986. Defendant also appeals the demal, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Defendant was sentenced to a term of fifteen years as a prior and persistent offender, § 558.016 (Supp.1993).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opimon for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Edwards, 902 S.W.2d 378, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1353, 1995 WL 434307 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

902 S.W.2d 378 (State v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.