State v. Edwards

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Edwards

851 S.W.2d 127, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 596, 1993 WL 128197

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Edwards. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 160 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 27, 1993·No. Nos. 60631, 61970·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of § 195.202, RSMo Cum.Supp.1992. In addition to his direct appeal, he also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, in violation of § 195.202, RSMo Cum.Supp.1992. In addition to his direct appeal, he also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgments are affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Edwards, 851 S.W.2d 127, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 596, 1993 WL 128197 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

851 S.W.2d 127 (State v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.