State v. Edwards

943 S.W.2d 338
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Edwards. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 160
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 8, 1997·No. Nos. 68406, 70483·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

After the defendant was convicted of attempted forcible rape, § 566.030, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, he was sentenced by the court as a persistent offender to consecutive terms of twenty five and ten years. He filed a motion under Rule 29.15 which was overruled. He appeals, but raises no points of error relating to the 29.15 motion.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Edwards, 943 S.W.2d 338 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

943 S.W.2d 338 (State v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.