State v. Dupree

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Dupree

DecidedMay 20, 2003

Docket2003-UP-344

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Dupree (State v. Dupree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Dupree, (S.C. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Leroy Dupree #2, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-344
Submitted March 26, 2003 Filed May 20, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Leroy Dupree was charged with trafficking in crack cocaine and failure to stop for a blue light/siren. The jury was unable to reach a verdict as to trafficking in crack cocaine. The judge granted a mistrial with respect to the trafficking charge. Dupree was convicted of failure to stop for a blue light/siren. He was sentenced to three years. Duprees appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from representation, asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable merit. Dupree did not file a pro se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON, and HUFF, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Leroy Dupree #2, Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-344
Submitted March 26, 2003 Filed May 20, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren B. Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Leroy Dupree was charged with trafficking in crack cocaine and failure to stop for a blue light/siren. The jury was unable to reach a verdict as to trafficking in crack cocaine. The judge granted a mistrial with respect to the trafficking charge. Dupree was convicted of failure to stop for a blue light/siren. He was sentenced to three years. Duprees appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from representation, asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable merit. Dupree did not file a pro se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON, and HUFF, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Dupree, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dupree-scctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack