State v. Dennis
713 N.E.2d 426, 86 Ohio St. 3d 201
This text of 713 N.E.2d 426 (State v. Dennis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Dennis, 713 N.E.2d 426, 86 Ohio St. 3d 201 (Ohio 1999).
Opinion
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals denying appellant’s application for reopening for the reasons articulated by the court of appeals. Appellant has offered no compelling justification why his application was filed beyond the time required in App.R. 26(B).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
George T. Franklin, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Carl S. Anderson, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-Appellee
434 F.3d 412 (Sixth Circuit, 2006)
Franklin v. Anderson
Sixth Circuit, 2006
State v. Baker, Unpublished Decision (1-27-2005)
2005 Ohio 565 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State v. Reed, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2003)
2003 Ohio 5441 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)
State v. Kaszas, Unpublished Decision (8-14-2000)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000
State v. Dennis
1999 Ohio 94 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
713 N.E.2d 426, 86 Ohio St. 3d 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-dennis-ohio-1999.