State v. Davis

468 S.W.3d 467, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 833, 2015 WL 5025168
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1050
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 25, 2015·No. No. ED 100925·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jody Lee Davis (“Defendant”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County convicting him of one count of possession of child pornography, in violation of section 573.037, RSMo (2000). Defendant contends the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion for acquittal at the close of all evidence because the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, and (2) admitting two uncharged images of child pornography.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. ■ We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 468 S.W.3d 467, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 833, 2015 WL 5025168 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

468 S.W.3d 467 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.