Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Daniel

State v. Daniel

35 P.3d 1106, 178 Or. App. 154
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 14, 2001
Docket9910-70091 A108345
StatusPublished

This text of 35 P.3d 1106 (State v. Daniel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Daniel, 35 P.3d 1106, 178 Or. App. 154 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

35 P.3d 1106 (2001)
178 Or. App. 154

In the Matter of Stephen Daniel, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
Stephen DANIEL, Appellant.

9910-70091; A108345

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted on Record and Briefs October 5, 2001.
Decided November 14, 2001.

Susan D. Isaacs filed the brief for appellant.

Jas. Jeffrey Adams filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Buffum, 166 Or.App. 552, 999 P.2d 541, rev. allowed 331 Or. 361, 19 P.3d 354 (2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Buffum
999 P.2d 541 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)
State v. Daniel
35 P.3d 1106 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 P.3d 1106, 178 Or. App. 154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-daniel-orctapp-2001.