State v. Charles

827 So. 2d 562, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 0444, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 2972, 2002 WL 31207322
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 2, 2002
DocketNo. 02-0444
StatusPublished

This text of 827 So. 2d 562 (State v. Charles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Charles, 827 So. 2d 562, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 0444, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 2972, 2002 WL 31207322 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

AMY, Judge.

For the reasons discussed in the companion case in this consolidated matter, State of Louisiana v. Herbert Charles, Jr., 02-0443 (La.App. 3 Cir.10/02/02), 827 So.2d 553, the defendant’s convictions and sentences are affirmed. This matter is remanded and the trial court instructed to inform the defendant of the two-year prescriptive period provided for in La.Code Crim.P. art. 930.8 by sending appropriate written notice to the defendant within ten days of the rendition of this opinion and to file written proof that the defendant received the notice in the record of the proceedings.

[563]*563AFFIRMED. REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Charles
827 So. 2d 553 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
827 So. 2d 562, 2002 La.App. 3 Cir. 0444, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 2972, 2002 WL 31207322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-charles-lactapp-2002.