State v. Burns
812 P.2d 837, 107 Or. App. 380, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 808
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMay 22, 1991
Docket88-07-1542-C3; CA A62161; 88-07-1542-C2; CA A62298
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 812 P.2d 837 (State v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Burns, 812 P.2d 837, 107 Or. App. 380, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 808 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).
Opinion
After a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendants were convicted of manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1), (4). They claim that the court erred in denying their motions to suppress and motions to controvert.
The facts of this case are set out in State v. Morrison/Bartee, 107 Or App 343, 812 P2d 832 (1991), and the law and the result are the same.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Burns
816 P.2d 1219 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Morrison/Bartee
812 P.2d 832 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
812 P.2d 837, 107 Or. App. 380, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-burns-orctapp-1991.