State v. Burns
812 P.2d 837, 107 Or. App. 380, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 808
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided May 22, 1991·No. 88-07-1542-C3; CA A62161; 88-07-1542-C2; CA A62298·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
After a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendants were convicted of manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1), (4). They claim that the court erred in denying their motions to suppress and motions to controvert.
The facts of this case are set out in State v. Morrison/Bartee, 107 Or App 343, 812 P2d 832 (1991), and the law and the result are the same.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Burns, 812 P.2d 837, 107 Or. App. 380, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 808 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).
812 P.2d 837 (State v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Burns
816 P.2d 1219 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Morrison/Bartee
812 P.2d 832 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)