State v. Burns
816 P.2d 1219, 108 Or. App. 773, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1385
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Burns. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 Or. App. 380 →
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 11, 1991·No. 88-07-1542-C3; CA A62161; 88-07-1542-C2; CA A62298·Published
Opinion
Defendants have petitioned for review of our decision. 107 Or App 380, 812 P2d 837 (1991).1 We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, and allow it. For reasons explained in State v. Morrison/Bartee, 108 Or App 766, 816 P2d 1217 (1991), we modify our decision, vacate defendants’ convictions and remand for further proceedings as directed in State v. Morrison/Bartee, supra.
Petition for reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; convictions vacated; remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Burns, 816 P.2d 1219, 108 Or. App. 773, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 1385 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).
816 P.2d 1219 (State v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Morrison/Bartee
812 P.2d 832 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Burns
812 P.2d 837 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Morrison
816 P.2d 1217 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)