State v. Burks

2012 Ohio 5629
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 5, 2012
Docket2012-1195
StatusPublished

This text of 2012 Ohio 5629 (State v. Burks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Burks, 2012 Ohio 5629 (Ohio 2012).

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Burks, 134 Ohio St.3d 378, 2012-Ohio-5629.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BURKS, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Burks, 134 Ohio St.3d 378, 2012-Ohio-5629.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2012-1195—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 5, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-12-11116. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and Evy M. Jarrett, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Deborah Kovac Rump and Jane E. Roman, for appellee. Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Steven L. Taylor, Chief Counsel, Appellate Division, for amicus curiae Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O’Brien. ______________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Burks
982 N.E.2d 708 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 Ohio 5629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-burks-ohio-2012.