State v. Burks

2012 Ohio 5629
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Burks. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 Ohio St. 3d 378
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 5, 2012·No. 2012-1195·Published

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Burks, 134 Ohio St.3d 378, 2012-Ohio-5629.]

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BURKS, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Burks, 134 Ohio St.3d 378, 2012-Ohio-5629.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2012-1195—Submitted December 4, 2012—Decided December 5, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-12-11116. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. __________________ Julia R. Bates, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and Evy M. Jarrett, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Deborah Kovac Rump and Jane E. Roman, for appellee. Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Steven L. Taylor, Chief Counsel, Appellate Division, for amicus curiae Franklin County Prosecutor Ron O’Brien. ______________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Burks, 2012 Ohio 5629 (Ohio 2012).

2012 Ohio 5629 (State v. Burks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Burks
982 N.E.2d 708 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)