State v. Burgess

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

State v. Burgess

DecidedJune 24, 2003

Docket2003-UP-428

StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Burgess (State v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Burgess, (S.C. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Trayawn L. Burgess, Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County
J. Michael Baxley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2003-UP-428
Submitted April 18, 2003 Filed June 24, 2003

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Tara S. Taggart, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel Tommy Evans and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Trayawn L. Burgess appeals from an order of the trial court revoking his probation. The court found a willful violation of probation and revoked five years of a ten-year sentence. Burgess appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel additionally submitted a petition to be relieved from representation, asserting there are no directly appealable issues of arguable merit. Burgess did not file a pro se response with the Court.

After a review of the record pursuant to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved. [1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

CURETON, ANDERSON, and HUFF, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI