State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Brown

573 So. 2d 1144, 1991 La. LEXIS 342, 1991 WL 15337

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedFebruary 4, 1991

DocketNo. 91-KH-0212

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 573 So. 2d 1144 (State v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Brown, 573 So. 2d 1144, 1991 La. LEXIS 342, 1991 WL 15337 (La. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Brown, Richie Lee; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Assumption, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 15253.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegally-lenient sentence he has filed on or about March 19, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district [1145]*1145court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brown, Richie Lee; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Assumption, 23rd Judicial District Court, Div. “A”, No. 15253.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegally-lenient sentence he has filed on or about March 19, 1990. If relator’s representation is correct, the district [1145]*1145court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 So. 2d 1144, 1991 La. LEXIS 342, 1991 WL 15337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-brown-la-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack